Cycling Forums UK : www.veloriders.co.uk :: View topic - Veloriders US election poll

Home FAQ Register Usergroups Search Memberlist Gallery StatisticsForum Sponsors •  Photo RequestProfile • Links Log in to check your private messagesLog inBC Eastmidlands

Veloriders US election poll
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cycling Forums UK : www.veloriders.co.uk Forum Index -> Polls
View previous topic :: View next topic  

McCain or Obama?
McCain
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Obama
100%
 100%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 2

Author Message
blimpyboy
E, Silver


Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Posts: 560
Location: Hibaldstownia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama. Lets get the USA back on track!
_________________
"These are for you McNulty"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stuart Kirkham
E, Silver


Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 744
Location: Stockport

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

McCain because he is the underdog.

Stuart. Cool
_________________
S.M.Kirkham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
martin smith
World Champ


Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 12187
Location: shoehorning kittens into jars

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stuart Kirkham wrote:
McCain because he is the underdog.

Stuart. Cool


he's the underdog because he's an idiot.
_________________
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hans Datdodishes
T de F Winner


Joined: 28 Feb 2002
Posts: 28370
Location: On the Superior Forum with the cool kids

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


_________________
World Masters Drive HillClimb For Taureans Category C Champion 2013.

I'm a qualified coach.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stuart Kirkham
E, Silver


Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 744
Location: Stockport

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

McCain is certainly an improvement on George W Bush though due to Bush's mismanagement and failure the odds are very much against him winning.

Stuart. Cool
_________________
S.M.Kirkham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
martin smith
World Champ


Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 12187
Location: shoehorning kittens into jars

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stuart Kirkham wrote:
McCain is certainly an improvement on George W Bush though due to Bush's mismanagement and failure the odds are very much against him winning.

Stuart. Cool


jade goody would be an improvement on george bush. i think the phrase is damning with faint praise....
_________________
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
HowardD
E, Silver


Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 819
Location: Voiture Balai

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama = Dead man walking
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Billy Boy
T de F Winner


Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 30726
Location: Not Aylesbury

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HowardD wrote:
Obama = Dead man walking


Now THAT is a cool trick. Cool
_________________
"Well done, you are 100% absolutely without a shadow of a doubt spot-bollock-on correct." - Tucker

"Eating is not for wimps" - coal miner

"most of us don't have your brilliance." - John McC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
JONNO
Div 1 Pro


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 9031
Location: Up North

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is this the same election that seems to have been going on for the last 15 years or do they keep starting again?
_________________
I was being chased by a police dog last week, and made the mistake of trying to escape through a little tunnel, over a see-saw and through a hoop of fire. It finally caught me as I was weaving in and out of some sticks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HowardD
E, Silver


Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 819
Location: Voiture Balai

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Billy Boy wrote:
HowardD wrote:
Obama = Dead man walking


Now THAT is a cool trick. Cool


If Obama wins, he won't live to see Easter 2009.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Billy Boy
T de F Winner


Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 30726
Location: Not Aylesbury

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HowardD wrote:
Billy Boy wrote:
HowardD wrote:
Obama = Dead man walking


Now THAT is a cool trick. Cool


If Obama wins, he won't live to see Easter 2009.


So he's not dead? I'm confused now. Confused
_________________
"Well done, you are 100% absolutely without a shadow of a doubt spot-bollock-on correct." - Tucker

"Eating is not for wimps" - coal miner

"most of us don't have your brilliance." - John McC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
gswarbrick
E, Gold


Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 2478
Location: Why would anyone care?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

martin smith wrote:
gswarbrick wrote:
Obama. Just a shame that he's more of a religious nutter than Bush, let alone McCain...


rubbish, pound to a penny he's an atheist who just knows what he has to say to be elected. when pressed about his specific beliefs he don't half go into vague mode.


Did you see the Simon Schama programme about the role of religion in American life/politics? He was pretty unambiguous in that.
_________________
Guy Swarbrick
Editor
trackcycling
http://www.trackcycling.me.uk

You can also follow me on Twitter - gswarbrick and trackcycling
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
martin smith
World Champ


Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 12187
Location: shoehorning kittens into jars

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gswarbrick wrote:
martin smith wrote:
gswarbrick wrote:
Obama. Just a shame that he's more of a religious nutter than Bush, let alone McCain...


rubbish, pound to a penny he's an atheist who just knows what he has to say to be elected. when pressed about his specific beliefs he don't half go into vague mode.


Did you see the Simon Schama programme about the role of religion in American life/politics? He was pretty unambiguous in that.


Quote:
I was not raised in a particularly religious household, as undoubtedly many in the audience were. My father, who returned to Kenya when I was just two, was born Muslim but as an adult became an atheist. My mother, whose parents were non-practicing Baptists and Methodists, was probably one of the most spiritual and kindest people I've ever known, but grew up with a healthy skepticism of organized religion herself. As a consequence, so did I.


Quote:
"For one, they need to understand the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but the robustness of our religious practice. Folks tend to forget that during our founding, it wasn't the atheists or the civil libertarians who were the most effective champions of the First Amendment. It was the persecuted minorities, it was Baptists like John Leland who didn't want the established churches to impose their views on folks who were getting happy out in the fields and teaching the scripture to slaves. It was the forbearers of the evangelicals who were the most adamant about not mingling government with religious, because they did not want state-sponsored religion hindering their ability to practice their faith as they understood it.

Moreover, given the increasing diversity of America's population, the dangers of sectarianism have never been greater. Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.

And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles.

This brings me to my second point. Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all."


sounds like a sceptic who knows not to irritate the majority of his voters to me.
_________________
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tony Bell
T de F Winner


Joined: 06 Aug 2003
Posts: 25203

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The real McCain. It would be funny if he wasn't attempting to become the most powerful man on the planet... Sad
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c&feature=related
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
JONNO
Div 1 Pro


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 9031
Location: Up North

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

martin smith wrote:
gswarbrick wrote:
martin smith wrote:
gswarbrick wrote:
Obama. Just a shame that he's more of a religious nutter than Bush, let alone McCain...


rubbish, pound to a penny he's an atheist who just knows what he has to say to be elected. when pressed about his specific beliefs he don't half go into vague mode.


Did you see the Simon Schama programme about the role of religion in American life/politics? He was pretty unambiguous in that.


Quote:
I was not raised in a particularly religious household, as undoubtedly many in the audience were. My father, who returned to Kenya when I was just two, was born Muslim but as an adult became an atheist. My mother, whose parents were non-practicing Baptists and Methodists, was probably one of the most spiritual and kindest people I've ever known, but grew up with a healthy skepticism of organized religion herself. As a consequence, so did I.


Quote:
"For one, they need to understand the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but the robustness of our religious practice. Folks tend to forget that during our founding, it wasn't the atheists or the civil libertarians who were the most effective champions of the First Amendment. It was the persecuted minorities, it was Baptists like John Leland who didn't want the established churches to impose their views on folks who were getting happy out in the fields and teaching the scripture to slaves. It was the forbearers of the evangelicals who were the most adamant about not mingling government with religious, because they did not want state-sponsored religion hindering their ability to practice their faith as they understood it.

Moreover, given the increasing diversity of America's population, the dangers of sectarianism have never been greater. Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.

And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles.

This brings me to my second point. Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all."


sounds like a sceptic who knows not to irritate the majority of his voters to me.


Sounds like he's got a press corps of about 50 scribes writing and analysing every utterance before it's made to me.
_________________
I was being chased by a police dog last week, and made the mistake of trying to escape through a little tunnel, over a see-saw and through a hoop of fire. It finally caught me as I was weaving in and out of some sticks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gswarbrick
E, Gold


Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 2478
Location: Why would anyone care?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

martin smith wrote:

sounds like a sceptic who knows not to irritate the majority of his voters to me.


I hope you're right.
_________________
Guy Swarbrick
Editor
trackcycling
http://www.trackcycling.me.uk

You can also follow me on Twitter - gswarbrick and trackcycling
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
david123
E, Silver


Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 1868

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gswarbrick wrote:
martin smith wrote:
gswarbrick wrote:
Obama. Just a shame that he's more of a religious nutter than Bush, let alone McCain...


rubbish, pound to a penny he's an atheist who just knows what he has to say to be elected. when pressed about his specific beliefs he don't half go into vague mode.


Did you see the Simon Schama programme about the role of religion in American life/politics? He was pretty unambiguous in that.


Did you see Schama making a complete prizck of himself on election night around 3 am or so on David Dim will bes election programme, don't know if he was piszsed or what but his childish behaviour was interesting to compare to his historical anaysis on his BBC programmes. At one point ThimbleWeed asked him how he managed to do history when he couldn't even wait an hour for the result, Gore Vidal turned up, probably proportionately piszsed, aswell and he was hilarious, Dimbo cut him off after five minutes.
_________________
Tony Bell dates my hamster
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cycling Forums UK : www.veloriders.co.uk Forum Index -> Polls All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Important Notice: VeloRiders copyrights all images appearing on this website and in the Gallery. Images are displayed for viewing only, and commercial or personal use of any of these images without the written permission of VeloRiders is prohibited under international copyright law. Copyright 2002/2013 VeloRiders. All rights reserved.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

E-mail VeloRiders. Comments, questions or send your photos to , Order your photos@

RSS News Feed
aegishosting