Cycling Forums UK : www.veloriders.co.uk :: View topic - Should d r u g s be l e g a l i s e d?

Home FAQ Register Usergroups Search Memberlist Gallery StatisticsForum Sponsors •  Photo RequestProfile • Links Log in to check your private messagesLog inBC Eastmidlands

Should d r u g s be l e g a l i s e d?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cycling Forums UK : www.veloriders.co.uk Forum Index -> Polls
View previous topic :: View next topic  

make it L E G A L?
yes
20%
 20%  [ 12 ]
no
79%
 79%  [ 47 ]
Total Votes : 59

Author Message
the shadowy darkforces
E, Bronze


Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 279

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:52 pm    Post subject: Should d r u g s be l e g a l i s e d? Reply with quote

making a deal with the devil or another way to make the sport clean
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick
Div 3 Pro


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 3974
Location: Royston Vasey

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mods, delete this thread please.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Tucker
Tour Winner


Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 15722
Location: Swindon

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No - testing means that cyclists are less likely to do serious harm to themselves i.e. they have to keep their consumption "moderate" to still beat the tests. Tom Simpson said "if it takes 10 to kill me, give me 9", an attitude I have no doubt is shared by many professional cyclists.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the shadowy darkforces
E, Bronze


Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 279

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, think they would really hit it hard if there was no short term risks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IainW
E, Silver


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 1996

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

and when do you start juicing them? which parents are going to stick the needles in the under 8's Mad Would you do it to your kids?

effin stupid post!
Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick
Div 3 Pro


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 3974
Location: Royston Vasey

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IainW wrote:
and when do you start juicing them? which parents are going to stick the needles in the under 8's Mad Would you do it to your kids?

effin stupid post!
Evil or Very Mad


Ditto.

Delete.

And finally, how the hell can a sport be made 'clean' be allowing 'd r u g s?

So not only is this a pointless thread, but it doesn't make any sense either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Zeco2
E, Gold


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 2190
Location: Prickwillow

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Patrick wrote:
Mods, delete this thread please.


Apparently Socrates was obliged to take poison because his views didn't coincide with those of the day. I suppose deletion of one's thread might just be considered a preferable fate? Neutral
_________________
The British Monarchy = Institutionalised Privilage
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
p*bongo
E, Silver


Joined: 27 May 2004
Posts: 1202
Location: In the woods with the bears

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yea but no but.... its being deleted anyway!
_________________
Follow me on twitter - @Mralibongo
Dolphins can sometimes bite.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
david123
E, Silver


Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 1868

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone asks a question to which he would like an answer, others dont want this to happen for whatever reason, the reason not being supplied except in a sideways fashion by one of the "Disgustified of Tunbridge Wails". If we are to censor questioners in this fashion we might as well all go and get our coats ,Oh I get it , its a joke, but please tell me whos telling it. Hints of Maily Dale here wudnt u think.
_________________
Tony Bell dates my hamster
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mattr
World Champ


Joined: 16 Apr 2004
Posts: 12647

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Patrick wrote:
And finally, how the hell can a sport be made 'clean' be allowing 'd r u g s?

So not only is this a pointless thread, but it doesn't make any sense either.


you don't follow many other sports do you, many make the sport clean by ignoring the problem, effectively what has been suggested here.

I disagree, they should remain banned, but it is a valid point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tucker
Tour Winner


Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 15722
Location: Swindon

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Patrick wrote:
And finally, how the hell can a sport be made 'clean' be allowing 'd r u g s?

So not only is this a pointless thread, but it doesn't make any sense either.


Firstly, the author made no mention of the word clean.

However, there is a very easy answer to your question. Cycling is "dirty" because riders take banned drugs. If no drugs were banned, then cycling would be clean. Simple eh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roy Gardiner
T de F Winner


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 21249
Location: London and Essex

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not going to delete this thread.

- In sport, drugs must not be legalised.

- In real life, drugs must be legalised.

Good 'ere innit?
_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken

"Everything in war is simple, but the simplest thing is difficult." Carl Von Clausewitz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kb7
E, Bronze


Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 394
Location: Hullgaria and Lagos

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roy Gardiner wrote:
I'm not going to delete this thread.

- In sport, drugs must not be legalised.

- In real life, drugs must be legalised.

Good 'ere innit?

Agree 100%.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IainW
E, Silver


Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 1996

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

what next? Go Ride club enlists the help of modern day Dr Josef Mengele.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joursans
Div 2 Pro


Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 4840
Location: The Whole Year Inn

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funnily enough a work colleague asked me the same question in the pub last night.

I have always thought free speech was a vastly overated "liberty" so rather than engage in a constructive debate on the issue I deleted him. Wink
_________________
I tell myself I will not go,
even as I drive there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DNAse
E, Gold


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 2414
Location: Oxfordshire

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this is certainly a valid opinion and discussion. I think there could be a case for allowing any form of doping/treatment/manipulation BUT having a set of predefined "safe" biochemical/physiological parameters (eg testosterone level, Haematocrit etc) Exceeding these levels would result in dsiqualification and suspension.

However cycling cannot act unilaterally, I think every sport needs the same frame work otherwise you would get the pro-wrestling situation where it is viewed as entertainment rather than sport.
_________________
"Train?! Training is for people with no natural ability!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Festina_Lente
E, Bronze


Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 317
Location: Algarve

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What a debate!

How about neither yes or no?

I mean the d r u g s problem is unlikely to go away. Even with efficient methods, there will still be a chancer, as Vino prooved.

They are all grown men, they can make whatever dessisions they like, regarding their health. Some people choose to drink, others drive fast...

We don't mind medically enhanced celebrities and the Americans don't seem to mind medically enhanced atheletes (MLB, NBA, NFL), so why not cyclists?

Durring prohibition, the unscrupulous profited. As is happening in cycling. Allowing drinking hasn't turned everyone into an alcoholic. Aren't those that abuse these things are likely to do so anyway?

The middle ground?

How about having medical controls and monitor whether someone is fit to compete, or unfit, as can happen anyway in cycling, before even d r u g s come in to it e.g. athelete suffering septal heart defect, anemea

Thus allowing people to compete on the same terms, not handing advantage to those who do cheat, protecting an atheletes diginity and protecting the health of those who compete, beyond what anti- d o p i n g does.


It would be nice if people could just be honest though...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Des
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 19 Apr 2002
Posts: 16900
Location: Harrow

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Festina_Lente wrote:
What a debate!

How about neither yes or no?

I mean the d r u g s problem is unlikely to go away. Even with efficient methods, there will still be a chancer, as Vino prooved.

They are all grown men, they can make whatever dessisions they like, regarding their health. Some people choose to drink, others drive fast...

We don't mind medically enhanced celebrities and the Americans don't seem to mind medically enhanced atheletes (MLB, NBA, NFL), so why not cyclists?

Durring prohibition, the unscrupulous profited. As is happening in cycling. Allowing drinking hasn't turned everyone into an alcoholic. Aren't those that abuse these things are likely to do so anyway?

The middle ground?

How about having medical controls and monitor whether someone is fit to compete, or unfit, as can happen anyway in cycling, before even d r u g s come in to it e.g. athelete suffering septal heart defect, anemea

Thus allowing people to compete on the same terms, not handing advantage to those who do cheat, protecting an atheletes diginity and protecting the health of those who compete, beyond what anti- d o p i n g does.


It would be nice if people could just be honest though...


At its simplest level it defraunds and disadvantages those who want to ride clean, as well as preurrising them to turn to chemical assistance in order to compete.

Re the health testing, most EU governing bodies insist on a medical certificate (including heart screening) before issuing even an amateur licence.
_________________
www.kentonrc.co.uk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
clouchi
E, Silver


Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 901
Location: The Glorious South West

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

even with health checks, some would push too far. and riders keeling over in the tour would look even worse than a few positive tests - would you let your kids do a sport where you can and indeed have to turn to *CENSORED* to stand a chance?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the shadowy darkforces
E, Bronze


Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 279

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont think that the current reality is -take d r u g s or loose. Are there any facts as too how much these products improve performance
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cycling Forums UK : www.veloriders.co.uk Forum Index -> Polls All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Important Notice: VeloRiders copyrights all images appearing on this website and in the Gallery. Images are displayed for viewing only, and commercial or personal use of any of these images without the written permission of VeloRiders is prohibited under international copyright law. Copyright 2002/2013 VeloRiders. All rights reserved.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

E-mail VeloRiders. Comments, questions or send your photos to , Order your photos@

RSS News Feed
aegishosting