View previous topic :: View next topic |
Blood Doping: Is It Worth It? |
yes |
|
40% |
[ 17 ] |
no |
|
59% |
[ 25 ] |
|
Total Votes : 42 |
|
Author |
Message |
jessi Elite Poster


Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 236 Location: cannock
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:07 pm Post subject: Blood Doping: Is It Worth It? |
|
|
I know that this is obviously a contraversial subject, but I have to do an A level essay on the pros and cons of blood doping.
Your opinions and ideas would be gretly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jess  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
legro Moderator


Joined: 28 Feb 2002 Posts: 28780 Location: Colchester
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
whats to say? _________________ www.mastercoach.co.uk
NLP Practitioner
Fear leads to anger....Anger leads to Stress......Stress leads to Doobies...and Doobies leads to Twinkies
The spirit of Brian must live on
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jessi Elite Poster


Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 236 Location: cannock
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
legro wrote: |
whats to say? |
I agree, but I need to show both sides of the argument if I want a decent grade.
I also thought that adding a table on poll results would be good, as we need to use charts, graphs etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DNAse E, Gold

Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 2414 Location: Oxfordshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well it's against the rules so is cheating. If you want to cheat that's up to you. Whether it's worth it or not depends on what is at stake and your own personal priorities and morals.
TBH I can't see any pros unless you value ill-gotten gains _________________ "Train?! Training is for people with no natural ability!" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew Jackson E, Gold

Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 3128 Location: Barton under Needwood
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
People smoke, drink and have poor lifestyles that damage their health, and do it knowingly. I guess for some blood doping is the same, they evaluate the risks and make a choice. _________________ You can't polish a turd |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Billy Boy T de F Winner

Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Posts: 30726 Location: Not Aylesbury
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jessi wrote: |
legro wrote: |
whats to say? |
I agree, but I need to show both sides of the argument if I want a decent grade.
I also thought that adding a table on poll results would be good, as we need to use charts, graphs etc. |
You need to craft a well worded thought provoking question to encourage some discussion, then hey presto.  _________________ "Well done, you are 100% absolutely without a shadow of a doubt spot-bollock-on correct." - Tucker
"Eating is not for wimps" - coal miner
"most of us don't have your brilliance." - John McC |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rich Hill Tour Winner

Joined: 15 Aug 2002 Posts: 15188 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is the situation....
If you are a professional cyclist and you want to get results... and you know that you ride well above normal if you blood dope -and it gets you into a position to win...
Would you dope....?
I hope few people are put in this situation but thats just what happens when a bit of talent is pushed TOO far... _________________ Imagination is the war against reality.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DNAse E, Gold

Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 2414 Location: Oxfordshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andrew Jackson wrote: |
People smoke, drink and have poor lifestyles that damage their health, and do it knowingly. I guess for some blood doping is the same, they evaluate the risks and make a choice. |
Poor comparison IMO. Chosing to damage your own health is one thing, cheating someone else out of a win/job/career is something completely different. _________________ "Train?! Training is for people with no natural ability!" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DNAse E, Gold

Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 2414 Location: Oxfordshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To clarify my position I am against cheating rather than "taking preparation". I might not be against blood doping if it were legal, properly regulated and freely available. _________________ "Train?! Training is for people with no natural ability!" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hans Datdodishes T de F Winner
Joined: 28 Feb 2002 Posts: 28370 Location: On the Superior Forum with the cool kids
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you use controversial and greatly then you might get a better grade.
Love from the grammar police. _________________ World Masters Drive HillClimb For Taureans Category C Champion 2013.
I'm a qualified coach. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MercMan E, Bronze

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 446 Location: Half a wheel behind Clive
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rich Hill wrote: |
This is the situation....
If you are a professional cyclist and you want to get results... and you know that you ride well above normal if you blood dope -and it gets you into a position to win...
Would you dope....?
I hope few people are put in this situation but thats just what happens when a bit of talent is pushed TOO far... |
If you were a good pro, lets say a team leader, with some good results. You want to move up to the next level, perhaps have a shot at winning a major classic, or a grand tour, a win that would cement your position within cycling. You have seen the results that others have achieved with this preparation, with few apparent side effects. One of them may have been a senior pro within your team, maybe even your hero / mentor. Also, very few have ever been caught, so you think there's a good chance you will get away with it. Given this situation, I think more would do it than not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew Jackson E, Gold

Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 3128 Location: Barton under Needwood
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DNAse wrote: |
Andrew Jackson wrote: |
People smoke, drink and have poor lifestyles that damage their health, and do it knowingly. I guess for some blood doping is the same, they evaluate the risks and make a choice. |
Poor comparison IMO. Chosing to damage your own health is one thing, cheating someone else out of a win/job/career is something completely different. |
The question was whether blood doping is worth it? I took that to mean the health risks V winning a few races. If the question was whether cheating was worth it I would have answered differently. _________________ You can't polish a turd |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chrisd Div 3 Pro
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 4004 Location: on the naughty step
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it depends on circumstances whether it is worth it or not.
if it was 1995 and EPO was undetectable and you were on the verge of losing a tour/putting in a bad performance and losing a contract then i suppose that you are really going to think about it.
but that raises the argument about is it wrong because you might get caught or it is morally wrong and what is legal and illegal?
the pros and cons are easy enough:
pros:
greater oxygen transported to the muscles, allows for quicker recovery and improved performance. nearly undetectable. will increase you ability as a cyclist.
cons:
if you get caught you are in trouble. you might die. is the administration of the *CENSORED* under the supervision of a doctor? i.e. do you know you are taking it properly and in the right amounts? will it affect you psychologically i.e. will you be able to race without it in the future?
i think it can be worth it, on the other hand you could throw away your career through greed (i.e. wanting to be a great rather than a good rider). i suppose it is a question the riders in that position have to ask themselves on a regular basis. _________________ Real men don't spin
http://www.alternativesanctuary.co.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sub4 E, Bronze
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 Posts: 350
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I recall back in the 'good old days' when I was charitable enough to donate blood, I would still go running afterwards. Probably about 4 hrs after. I always remember feeling really up for it and flying round!
I suspect that this was not due to some self-induced aura of generousity, but a hormonal response to blood loss. Not that I would suggest that there would be any benefit if racing over a series of days (far from it!).
Has this effect ever been measured?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dastardly E, Silver

Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Posts: 1791 Location: Lancashire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sure there are athletes out there who have done it, got glory, set themselves up financially and will live out their lives healthily. They would say it was worth it. If they get caught, theyd say it wasnt. _________________ May I present to you, the greatest breakthrough in travel since Sir Rodney Tricycle thought to himself, 'I'm bored of walking, i think i'll invent something with three wheels and a bell, and name it after myself.'
:The time machine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rich Hill Tour Winner

Joined: 15 Aug 2002 Posts: 15188 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another thing to add to this post -: Blood doping with your own bloody.. tricky but the team Dr should be able to help out.
Blood Doping with someone else blood...well for once words a failing me... _________________ Imagination is the war against reality.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Richard World Champ

Joined: 28 Jun 2002 Posts: 14007 Location: Coventry
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rich Hill wrote: |
Blood Doping with someone else blood...well for once words a failing me... |
yeah, put the wrong labels on the same blood type and re-inject the domestiques blood into the team leader's system and you're in all sorts of bother.....
because it's against the law and because it requires specia list medical knowledge and procedure and money (to store and transport it properly) I'm against it personally.
To blood dope means to cheat other people out of what could have been their win be it a Grand Tour or an Olympic Title - how many cyclists from the 1984 LA Olympics feel mighty peeved that the Americans cleaned up so much and later admitted to blood doping on an organised scale?
They were operating within the rules as were but still...... _________________ The internet is possibly the greatest bitch fest on earth. Expect anything than relentless ridicule for no good reason and your expectations are set way too high |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doozer E, Gold

Joined: 06 Mar 2002 Posts: 2476 Location: fragglerock
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you could count Flo Jo (ameriacan female 100/200m sprinter) as a good example. "Rumoured" to be heavily into doping she won loads but died at the age of 40 ish. apparently she retired the same year as out of competition testing came about. Before that you could only be tested at events which as we know (dave millar etc..) is a piece of pi$$ to get around.
Early death for *CENSORED* abuse should be a big part of an essay on pro's and cons IMHO. Great is you're a winner but sucks if you earn loads of cahs from it and only get 5-10 yrs of enjoyment from it...
Doozer _________________ Well, don't you know about the bird
Well, everybody knows that the bird is the word
A-well-a, bird, bird, b-bird's the word |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jessi Elite Poster


Joined: 10 Jul 2005 Posts: 236 Location: cannock
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blood doping is completly different to *CENSORED* taking in the sense that it does not introduce foreign bodies into your blood.
Baring this in mind, those who do not agree with blood doping, do you also disagree with training at altitude and using altitude beds/tents? All of these techniques have the exact same effect on an athletes blood - they increase the bloods viscosity therefore increasing the oxygen intake. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JONNO Div 1 Pro

Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 9031 Location: Up North
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jessi wrote: |
Blood doping is completly different to *CENSORED* taking in the sense that it does not introduce foreign bodies into your blood.
Baring this in mind, those who do not agree with blood doping, do you also disagree with training at altitude and using altitude beds/tents? All of these techniques have the exact same effect on an athletes blood - they increase the bloods viscosity therefore increasing the oxygen intake. |
Enough to incur the risk of premature death as highlighted in the post above? _________________ I was being chased by a police dog last week, and made the mistake of trying to escape through a little tunnel, over a see-saw and through a hoop of fire. It finally caught me as I was weaving in and out of some sticks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|